- Katılım
- 23 Eki 2020
- Mesajlar
- 1,828
The formula I've adopted was put on the Silicon Investor web site threadby 'bdog'. Basically, I just leave the Slowing Periods (mp3) to 1, so it really plays nopart in things. However, if somebody presents a good argument for using other than1 ... hey, I'm amenable. Chande, the original inventor, didn't use a moving average on the wholething. Chande's result was therefore sort of choppy. I guess along the waypeople decidedto add the EMA Periods to smooth things out. |
|
Stochastic RSI Customisable mp1:=Input("RSI Periods",1,377,13); mp2:=Input("Stoch Periods",1,377,13); mp3:=Input("Slowing Periods",1,377,1); mp4:=Input("EMA Periods",1,377,5); Mov(Sum((RSI(mp1)-LLV(RSI(mp1),mp2)),mp3)/ Sum((.0000001+(HHV(RSI(mp1),mp2)-(LLV(RSI(mp1),mp2)))),mp3),mp4,E)*100 |
Now, from various posts, etc., the following parameters (mp1, mp2 andmp4) *seem* to be the one's recommended. I'm trying to further find consensus among users of StochRSI on whatreally appears to work for them. StochRSI Set -------------------- 5 -- 5 -- 3 8 -- 8 -- 5 13 -- 13 -- 13 21 -- 15 -- 13 21 -- 21 -- 13 34 -- 34 -- 13 55 -- 55 -- 21 89 -- 13 -- 34 89 -- 89 -- 21 233 -- 233 -- 34 | |
| |
Source / From: | |
??? |
