### Teknik Analiz Dünyasına Hoşgeldiniz

Paylaşmak Güzeldir.

Tarama Verilerin Kriterler içinde olup olmadığı, Bilinen tüm matematiksel işlemleri verilere uygulayıp hızlıca sonuca ulaşma yolu...

#### algoritma

→ein+1=0←
Algorithmist
Algoritma

To: metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: ClaudB@xxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 1997 19:54:31 -0400 (EDT)
Resent-Date: Thu, 18 Sep 1997 17:54:35 -0600
Resent-From: metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Resent-Message-ID: <"csQWp3.0.0r5.wyR8q"@mail.equis.com>
Resent-Sender: metastock-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

When(C,>,Mov(C,50,E)) AND When(Stoch(5,3),<,80)
AND When(Stoch(5,3),>,Ref(Stoch(5,3),-1)
AND When(MACD(),<,1)
AND When(MACD(),>,Mov(MACD(),9,E)
AND When(Ref(MACD(),-2),<,Ref(Mov(MACD(),9,E),-2)
AND When(Ref(MACD(),-2),<,0)
AND When(Ref(MACD(),-10),>,MACD()))))

Regards,

ClaudB

[2446]

To: metastock-list@xxxxxxxxx
From: michael.arnoldi@xxxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 1997 20:32:25 -0400
Resent-Date: Thu, 18 Sep 1997 18:37:20 -0600
Resent-From: metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Resent-Message-ID: <"zQuM_1.0.K26._aS8q"@mail.equis.com>
Resent-Sender: metastock-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
col a:
Stoch(5,3)

col b:
Ref(Stoch(5,3), -1)

col c:
MACD()

col d:
Mov(MACD(),9,E)

col e:
Ref(MACD(), -2)

col f:
Ref(Mov(MACD(),9,E),-2)

filter:
enabled = YES

When(C,>,Mov(C,50,E))AND
When(C,>,Mov(C,200,S)) AND
When(colA,<,80)AND When(colA,>,colB)AND
When(colC,<,1)AND When(colC,>,colD)AND
When(colE,<,colF)AND When(colE,<,0)AND
When(Ref(MACD(),-10),<,colC

newly posted:​

When(C,>,Mov(C,50,E)) AND When(Stoch(5,3),<,80) AND
When(Stoch(5,3),>,Ref(Stoch(5,3),-1) AND
When(MACD(),<,1) AND
When(MACD(),>,Mov(MACD(),9,E) AND
When(Ref(MACD(),-2),<,Ref(Mov(MACD(),9,E),-2) AND
When(Ref(MACD(),-2),<,0) AND
When(Ref(MACD(),-10),>,MACD()))))

After this recent posting, i find that the BRADY BREAKOUT system looks different from a previous one posted.​

Which is the better one ??

I find that the first one hardly ever generates a list.

Mike

[2447]

To: michael.arnoldi@xxxxxxxx, metastock-list@xxxxxxxxx
From: Lionel Issen <lissen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 1997 10:18:31 -0500
Resent-Date: Fri, 19 Sep 1997 09:17:20 -0600
Resent-From: metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Resent-Message-ID: <"Jxl-m1.0.LQ7.-Tf8q"@mail.equis.com>
Resent-Sender: metastock-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Mike:

You are correct about the 1st filter. On a sample of 160 miscellaneous stocks, all were rejected.

With the 2nd filter, on a sample of 250 stocks, 75% were rejected. I need to examine these results to see where the better finds can be identified.

I looked at 4 stocks with high colA (stochastic) and 4 with low colA, there did not seem to be much correlation between the chart pattern and the value of the stochastic.​
NOTE: this is a very small sample. Most of these 8 stocks were in an uprend.

I would say that the 2nd filter is more useful.

Lionel

[2459] Source / From:
http://purebytes.com/archives/metastock/

### Forumdan daha fazla yararlanmak için giriş yapın yada üye olun!

Forumdan daha fazla yararlanmak için giriş yapın veya kayıt olun!

Kayıt ol

Forumda bir hesap oluşturmak tamamen ücretsizdir.

Şimdi kayıt ol
Giriş yap

Eğer bir hesabınız var ise lütfen giriş yapın

Giriş yap
Benzer Konular